Why this exists.
Pre-launch, building with design partners.
Why the file, and not the workflow
Most compliance software describes a process. What a regulator, a bank or a buyer's counsel actually asks for is a file: who was checked, by whom, on what date, against which list, and what the firm decided. That file is usually assembled at the end, out of email and folders, under time pressure, by the person who can least spare it.
Wasila starts from the file. The record exists from the moment a client file is opened, and each step writes to it as it happens rather than being reconstructed afterwards. The firm keeps the client, the obligation and the decision. The software's job is to make the evidence of that work producible on demand.
Three things we hold ourselves to
We publish the perimeter
What the software is, and what it is not, is set out on the trust page in the same words the site serves to answer engines. It is not buried in terms.
The firm stays the regulated party
Wasila supplies software. The customer holds its own licences, its own provider relationships and its own obligations, and makes its own decisions against its own thresholds.
Evidence over assertion
Every claim on this site that rests on a figure names its source and its date. Where we could not source a figure, the figure is not here.
Talk to us about implementing Wasila
Compliance, payments orchestration, or both. A member of the team will respond directly.